96 is not the fix
ross the boss posted,
In MY research first about Canadian notes. Canadian notes
up until 1967 were legally considered promissory
notes(supreme court bank of Montréal vs bank of
Canada). In 1967 Order in council 16 (1933 ) was
amended to permanently suspend the gold standard. HJR
192 DOES NOT APPLY IN THIS COUNTRY. Simple truth is
you are the trustee and have decided in your ignorance to
create a record that evidences you as a trustee for the
name on you birth certificate. This can be changed on
your live birth certificate which has never ceased to be the
property of the grantor (your mother)
“96 is the fix will not work “ the reason for this is SIMPLE
most likely you have either went signee die on your
account, there is no account or the courts have appointed
a new trustee “the CROWN” to uphold a spin thrift trust in
your favor. Whether the government or you is the trustee
doesn’t matter because if the beneficiary is insolvent the
trustee in some cases doesn’t have to release payment.
Only the beneficiary has the right to lay claim for trust
property. What property is that “your Name” to bad you
made a general deposit of your name and their fore are
now under statue.
Were we screwed up:
First we don’t have a record to prove that a trust
relationship exists. Rule of thumb “No one in a trust
needs to know or understand that one is being formed.”
To form a trust you need intent, parties(grantor ,trustee,
beneficiary), specific trust res and transfer of trust res. All
of this can be seen in your privately held foundation
documents.
This is a simple trust:
Mike (intent of Grantor) : “Give this pen(trust property) to
Timmy (beneficiary)”
Joe (Trustee received and accepts property and indenture):
“Okay Mike”
Timmy (Benificiary): “Joe thanks for the pen”
When you put a restricted signature on documents you
demonstrate your intent. When you issue a certificate of
deposit of original document you show they are not
general and are special in nature. You are the grantor “SIN
application” you granted the relationship with the CRA
and you failed to restrict your signature. This allows them
to construe the relationship and put you under legal
fiction statute. This system is fine and in many situations
can afford you a remedy at law. But If you want to learn
more I suggest you look into banking law… trust law.. and
equity courts.
2011 January 13 7:11 PM
replied,
who gives a flying fuck. stop trying to sound intelligent by usig big words on a skateboarding website
2011 January 13 7:35 PM
replied,
If you keep talking about politics, I'll start talking about religion and posting pornography.